Faith Odhiambo, President of the Law Society of Kenya (LSK), resigned on October 6, 2025, from the government-appointed Panel of Experts on Compensation of Victims of Demonstrations and Public Protests.
She described her decision as a matter of principle—but many are asking: did she step down for justice, or to protect her own image?
A Controversial Appointment
From the very beginning, Odhiambo’s appointment as Vice Chair drew sharp criticism. Some warned that accepting a government role risked compromising LSK’s independence.
By joining the panel, she entered a politically charged space where every move would be watched and questioned. For some, it was a chance to make a difference for victims. For others, it was a risky step that blurred the line between independence and state influence.
“My commitment to agitate for the rights of victims remains impregnable; I will continue to take up and prosecute matters on behalf of victims of police excesses during demonstrations, and work towards safeguarding holistic justice for victims.”
— Faith Odhiambo (kenyans.co.ke)
Timing and Pressure
Her resignation didn’t happen in isolation. It came after:The High Court suspended the panel’s operations.
Civil society questioned its legitimacy.
Media scrutiny intensified.
Was this truly a principled move—or a calculated retreat under pressure?
By stepping down now, Odhiambo distances herself and the LSK from growing criticism. But the deeper issues within the victims’ compensation process remain untouched.
Mixed Reactions
Her decision drew mixed responses across Kenya’s legal and political circles.
Supporters, like lawyer Levi Munyeri, praised her move as “better late than never.”
Critics, including former LSK President Nelson Havi, said she should never have accepted the role, arguing it was a clear conflict of interest.
For many, the question lingers: if Odhiambo’s intentions were noble, why take a position that risked LSK’s credibility in the first place?
Deeper Lessons
Beyond one resignation, the episode exposes persistent weaknesses in Kenya’s justice system:
Institutional Independence: Legal bodies still struggle to operate free from political influence.
Victims’ Rights: The compensation process remains slow, fragmented, and uncertain.
Public Trust: LSK’s reputation depends on whether it acts decisively or simply issues statements.
Odhiambo’s departure might calm public tension—but it does little to help the victims still waiting for accountability and relief.
The Bigger Question
Faith Odhiambo may have safeguarded her reputation—but who really benefits from her exit?
The government avoids further controversy. The LSK regains breathing room. But the victims, once again, remain in limbo.
The real story isn’t about who left the panel—it’s about whether Kenya’s legal institutions can rise above politics and deliver justice that truly reaches the people.
